Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.
Third world quarterly

In a new article in Third World Quarterly, Evan Easton-Calabria and Naohiko Omata critically examine the current extensive promotion of ‘self-reliance’ for refugees. They argue that the existing scholarship largely ignores the unsuccessful historical record of international assistance to foster refugees’ self-reliance and fails to discuss its problematic linkages to neoliberalism and the notion of ‘dependency’.

The article reveals that the current conceptualisation and practice of self-reliance are largely shaped by the priorities of international donors that aim to create cost-effective exit strategies from long-term refugee populations and minimise the cost of prolonged refugee situations. The authors argue that where uncritically interpreted and applied, the promotion of self-reliance can result in unintended and undesirable consequences for refugees’ well-being and protection.

The article is available to subscribers here: Panacea for the refugee crisis? Rethinking the promotion of ‘self-reliance’ for refugees

Related content

Evan Easton-Calabria People

Naohiko Omata People

The Global Governed: Refugees as Providers of Protection and Assistance Research

Refugee Economies Programme Research

Research in Brief: Refugee Self-Reliance: Moving Beyond the Marketplace Publications