Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The UK and France have worked together to jointly control their borders since the authorisation for construction of the Channel Tunnel in 1986. In the past 20 years, this cooperation has been significantly reinforced and expanded upon. The UK and France have engaged in an array of measures to achieve their aim of preventing ‘irregular’ migration from France to the UK. This includes the establishment of joint mechanisms to police and securitise the northern French coast, joint surveillance operations and the expansion of British-run detention facilities. This paper demonstrates that cooperation between the UK and France has not been successful in achieving its aims of preventing and deterring ‘irregular’ migrants from entering the UK. The measures taken under this cooperation create and reinforce harmful conditions for asylum seekers. I argue that the only way in which bilateral cooperation externalisation policies like those between the UK and France can achieve their aims is through the violation of the human rights of asylum seekers. Furthermore, I contend that the cooperation between the UK and France should partially be seen as a political façade, which demonstrates to the British public that the government is taking strong action against ‘irregular’ migration.

Download

Type

Working paper

Publisher

Refugee Studies Centre

Publication Date

12/06/2025

Volume

RSC Working Paper Series 142

Total pages

47