Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The impact of increasingly restrictionist policies for asylum seekers and refugees is reviewed from the perspective of social housing provision. This paper examines the instruments used to enact these policy shifts. The consequences are explored in terms of the social exclusion and destitution created by disqualifying most asylum seekers from access to local authority housing, by disentitlement to housing and welfare benefits and by fragmenting service delivery. The pragmatic restructuring of housing provision is then examined. The role of housing associations, who are increasingly significant providers for this client group, is reviewed. Financial and legal constraints to action have resulted in pragmatic responses, a generally poor quality of service provision, inadequate access procedures, lack of co‐ordination and networking, and limited institutional capacity. The paper explores these flaws in the current framework of provision and the ways in which practice can be improved to overcome them. However, it is concluded that the 1999 Asylum and Immigration Act, implementing the government's comprehensive review of asylum policy, is likely to compound poor service delivery and social exclusion, whilst failing to achieve the main objective of restrictionism and deterrence.

More information


Journal article


Taylor & Francis

Publication Date



20 (4)


235 - 254