Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

In a new article in the Review of International Studies, Alexander Betts, Naohiko Omata and Olivier Sterck explore why, despite the importance of cross-border activity to refugees’ socioeconomic lives, such transnational activity has been institutionally invisible to and hindered by the international agencies seeking to assist them. The authors take the Dollo Ado refugee camps in Ethiopia as a case study. Located close to the Ethiopian-Somali border, these camps have been a major focus for UNHCR’s attempts to build livelihoods for refugees and the host community. The article adopts a mixed methods approach, and emphasises the agency of aid workers, bureaucratic politics, and political economy in its account of the disjuncture between international institutions’ state-centric livelihoods programmes and refugees’ own cross-border economic strategies.

Read the article: Transnational blindness: International institutions and refugees’ cross-border activities

There is also a summary of this article published by British International Studies Association (BISA) available online: Refugees’ cross-border strategies and international organisations

Related content

Refugee Economies Programme Research

Reimagining Refugee Camps: Transforming Livelihoods in Dollo Ado [video]News & Media