Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

In 2005, the United Kingdom (UK) signed Memoranda of Understanding with Libya, Jordan and Lebanon. These memoranda allow the signatory nations to return individuals who are considered threats to the public safety of the host country, to their country of origin. This paper will show that the memoranda are both an extension of the UK’s security-focused migration policies and in conflict with the UK’s human rights obligations. First, it will be argued that the memoranda represent an effort by the UK, pre-dating and accelerated by the September 11th attacks, to frame migration policy control as a national security goal. Second, it will be argued that the non-binding nature of the memoranda and their lack of mechanisms for implementation and legal redress could negatively impact the principle of non-refoulement to torture.

More information


Working paper


Refugee Studies Centre

Publication Date




Total pages