Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The RSC Director talks to The Washington Post

There has been considerable discussion about the language used by politicians, media and others to describe the current refugee and migrant crisis in Europe. Last week, Al Jazeera English announced that it would no longer be using the term ‘migrant’ in relation to the crisis. So yesterday, the Washington Post posed the question ‘Is it time to ditch the word ‘migrant’?

One expert they spoke to was RSC Director, Professor Alexander Betts, who said: “It is very important to recognize that current challenges in Europe and globally are predominantly the result of refugee movements and not simply a ‘migrant crisis’ as implied by most politicians and the media.”

Regarding the use of terms such as ‘swarm’ and ‘marauding’ that have been used by UK politicians to describe the refugees and migrants seeking to enter the UK from Calais, he said “(w)ords that convey an exaggerated sense of threat can fuel anti-immigration sentiment and a climate of intolerance and xenophobia.” As he has said previously, the use of such language is very damaging.

Read the full article >>

Related content

Alexander Betts News & Media

Europe doesn’t have a choice about whether it engages with the global refugee crisis – it’s a question of how News & Media

Is the increase in asylum-seekers arriving in Europe a spike or a long-term trend? News & Media

Providing financial assistance isn’t enough; we must share responsibility for hosting refugees News & Media

'While Europe squabbles, people die' News & Media

‘Lack of safe access to asylum’ is the major shortcoming of EU asylum policy News & Media

From ‘swarm’ to ‘illegal’: dissecting how we talk about 'migrants' News & Media