Undoing Discriminatory Borders

Project aims

Immigration laws and migration controls distribute migration opportunities unequally, to the exclusion and disadvantage of many. While migration controls intrinsically distinguish between nationals and non-nationals, they also distribute the opportunity to move legally, often in ways that are directly or indirectly discriminatory against women, racial and religious groups and those whose sexual orientation, gender-identity or family status departs from the nuclear hetero-norm. Such discrimination may be identified within apparently neutral legal rules or migration statuses, or within algorithmic or other decision-making processes. Discrimination on what are, or may be, protected grounds, has a long history within immigration and nationality law, a brief consideration of which reveals its origins in colonial projects of racialised and gendered, dispossession, exclusion and subordination.

There is, however, surprisingly little analysis of whether such immigration and nationality rules and practices are unlawfully discriminatory. This is the case notwithstanding a multiplicity of legal prohibitions on discrimination and the ground-breaking rulings of national and international courts, which have found various laws and migration control practices to be discriminatory. This project aims to fill that gap, by bringing together a network of legal scholars with expertise in both migration and non-discrimination. The aim of the first phase of our research is to map the application of non-discrimination norms to immigration/nationality laws and migration controls, considering in so doing, relevant national, regional (including EU) and international laws.

This project will be launched with two online workshops on 20th and 27th October 2020, hosted jointly by the Refugee Studies Centre and the Centre for Fundamental Rights at the Hertie School, Berlin. Contact Catherine Briddick (catherine.briddick@qeh.ox.ac.uk) for further details.